The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has declared the Geo-Jang media group's SMS lucky draw scheme illegal. The PTA intends to initiate legal proceedings unless the group obtains necessary approval from the Supreme Court by the deadline.
Summary
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has termed a lucky draw scheme run by Geo-Jang media group as illegal and intends to initiate legal action.
“Failure to obtain a ruling on the subject matter from SCP (Supreme Court of Pakistan) before 28th Feb 2015 will result in legal action against Geo-Jang media group under contempt of court law,” a letter issued by the PTA to the media group said.
The group started a SMS lucky draw scheme titled “WORLDCUP HUNGAMA” with the announcement that people can win thousands of fabulous prizes through computerized lucky draw by sending their answers to three simple questions on a given number.
The group sought approval of the scheme from the PTA through a letter on Feb 15, though the scheme had already been launched.
“The scheme is in violation of the PTA policies and standing SCP judgment since its approval was not obtained from the authority prior to its launch,” the PTA letter to the group said.
A PTA spokesperson told JournalismPakistan.com the group has not intimated the PTA so far if it obtained any approval for its scheme from the Supreme Court.
“The PTA reserves its right to initiate legal action against the group if it fails to get approval of its scheme from the court,” he said.
Key Points
PTA deems Geo-Jang's lucky draw scheme illegal.
Legal action may be taken due to lack of approval.
Scheme launched without PTA consent also violates court ruling.
Dig deeper, ask anything — get instant context, background, and clarity.
Disclaimer: This feature is powered by AI and is intended to help readers explore and understand news stories more easily. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated responses may occasionally be incomplete or reflect limitations in the underlying model. This feature does not represent the editorial views of JournalismPakistan. For our full, verified reporting, please refer to the original article.
June 05, 2026: Pakistani camerapersons face serious risks covering floods, protests and attacks, often without training, protective gear or employer support.
May 31, 2026: May showed Pakistan's media under pressure from cybercrime enforcement, legal cases, newsroom layoffs and salary delays, plus tightened access for journalists.
May 24, 2026: Journalists walked out of the Parliament press gallery after claims that a Geo News reporter was barred from covering proceedings after questioning Bilawal.
May 23, 2026: Journalist Muhammad Saad was released after weeks in custody in a counterterrorism case; he thanked supporters and said he would not comment on the legal matter.
May 16, 2026: KP journalists protested over unpaid salaries and forced layoffs, demanding stronger labor protections and that state advertising be linked to clearing dues.
May 10, 2026: Journalist Imtiaz Chandio faces a terrorism FIR in Sindh after social media criticism of the SPSC, prompting concerns over use of penal laws against journalists.
May 04, 2026: PNP announced winners of its World Press Freedom Day Quiz 2026, a nationwide initiative to strengthen media literacy and awareness of press freedom.
June 05, 2026 Amar Guriro, founder of Pakistan's first AI-powered news platform, says journalism's future rests on human-AI collaboration to improve reporting while preserving editorial oversight.
June 05, 2026 Global Media Brief reviews pressures reshaping journalism, press freedom, AI and platform power, and reports BBC's Emmy, 60 Minutes turmoil and Taiwan's protest.
June 05, 2026 At the World News Media Congress in Marseille, publishers discussed how generative AI is altering newsroom workflows, audience engagement and content licensing.
June 04, 2026 Journalists in conflict zones face rising danger as combatants, states and militias increasingly target independent reporting to control narratives.
June 03, 2026 The 60 Minutes controversy at CBS exposes tensions over leadership, editorial independence and pressures on legacy TV journalism amid political polarization.