Publishers turn to three-pillar revenue models How to spot a credible news story in 2026 Pakistan escalates in absentia convictions against overseas journalists CBS airs previously shelved 60 Minutes Cecot prison report Bangladesh journalists fear heightened threats ahead of 2026 polls Press freedom concerns grow as threats to journalists rise in Indonesia How editors decide what not to publish on quiet news days Siasat.pk shuts Islamabad office as pressure mounts Tennessee court expands media access to executions IPI urges probe into smear campaign against Romanian reporter Publishers turn to three-pillar revenue models How to spot a credible news story in 2026 Pakistan escalates in absentia convictions against overseas journalists CBS airs previously shelved 60 Minutes Cecot prison report Bangladesh journalists fear heightened threats ahead of 2026 polls Press freedom concerns grow as threats to journalists rise in Indonesia How editors decide what not to publish on quiet news days Siasat.pk shuts Islamabad office as pressure mounts Tennessee court expands media access to executions IPI urges probe into smear campaign against Romanian reporter
Logo
Janu
Featured

PTA lawyers present conflicting views on X ban before Sindh High Court

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published: 13 September 2024 |  JP Staff Report

Join our WhatsApp channel

PTA lawyers present conflicting views on X ban before Sindh High Court
The Sindh High Court reviewed contradictory statements from PTA lawyers about the ongoing ban on X. The court has postponed the hearing for two weeks awaiting clarity on the issue.

KARACHI–Lawyers representing the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) provided contradictory statements before a two-member bench of the Sindh High Court on Friday regarding the status of the ban on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

The bench, comprising Chief Justice Mohammad Shafi Siddiqui and Justice Omar Sial, was hearing petitions filed against the ongoing suspension of mobile and internet services, as well as the ban on X, which has been in place since February of this year.

Ahsan Imam Rizvi, one of the PTA's lawyers, informed the court that the notification enforcing the ban on X had been withdrawn. This statement was met with skepticism by Abdul Moiz Jaferii, the counsel for the petitioners, who countered by stating that access to X was still unavailable to the public despite the claim.

To further complicate matters, when the court specifically inquired about the withdrawal of the notification, another PTA lawyer, Saad Siddiqui, expressed his uncertainty about the situation, admitting he did not know about the withdrawal.

The conflicting positions taken by PTA's legal team left the bench visibly perplexed. In response to the confusion, the court adjourned the hearing for two weeks and ordered the PTA and other respondents to return with a clear and unified stance on the status of the ban and related issues surrounding the suspension of internet services.

The ban on X has sparked significant debate since its imposition, with concerns over censorship, digital rights, and the impact on free speech. The case continues to attract attention as both the public and digital rights groups await clarity on the issue.

KEY POINTS:

  • PTA lawyers provided conflicting views on the ban of X.
  • Court adjourned hearing for two weeks to seek a unified stance from PTA.
  • Concerns over censorship and free speech have emerged due to the ban.
  • Public and digital rights groups are closely following the case.
  • The ban on X has been in effect since February this year.

Don't Miss These

Newsroom
Publishers turn to three-pillar revenue models

Publishers turn to three-pillar revenue models

 January 20, 2026 Publishers are adopting a three-pillar revenue model comprising advertising, subscriptions, and services to stabilize their finances and safeguard editorial independence.


How to spot a credible news story in 2026

How to spot a credible news story in 2026

 January 19, 2026 Guidance for readers to identify credible news in 2026 by checking AI disclosures, source transparency, verification practices and editorial oversight.


Pakistan escalates in absentia convictions against overseas journalists

Pakistan escalates in absentia convictions against overseas journalists

 January 19, 2026 Pakistan has escalated in absentia convictions and arrest warrants against overseas journalists, intensifying a crackdown on exiled critics, according to CPJ.


CBS airs previously shelved 60 Minutes Cecot prison report

CBS airs previously shelved 60 Minutes Cecot prison report

 January 19, 2026 CBS aired a shelved 60 Minutes report on El Salvador's CECOT prison, reigniting debate over editorial independence and alleged migrant abuses.


Bangladesh journalists fear heightened threats ahead of 2026 polls

Bangladesh journalists fear heightened threats ahead of 2026 polls

 January 19, 2026 A study finds Bangladeshi journalists expect heightened physical and digital threats ahead of the 2026 elections, citing safety gaps and weak newsroom support.


Popular Stories