Dawn calls life sentences for journalists an extreme move
JournalismPakistan.com | Published: 4 January 2026 | JP Staff Report
Join our WhatsApp channel
Dawn has criticized life sentences for journalists and YouTubers linked to May 9 commentary, calling the use of anti-terrorism laws disproportionate and harmful to press freedom.Summary
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan’s leading English-language daily Dawn on Sunday strongly opposed life sentences handed to journalists and YouTubers currently outside the country, calling the move extreme and potentially damaging to press freedom and legitimate dissent.
In an editorial titled 'Extreme move,' the newspaper warned that by choosing the harshest possible legal path, authorities risk setting a precedent that could extend far beyond the individuals involved and undermine independent journalism.
Concerns over anti-terror laws and proportionality
The editorial followed verdicts by an Islamabad anti-terrorism court that awarded two life sentences each to YouTuber Adil Raja, journalists Wajahat Saeed Khan, Sabir Shakir, and Shaheen Sehbai, anchorperson Haider Raza Mehdi, analyst Moeed Pirzada, and former army official Akbar Hussain in cases linked to the riots of May 9, 2023.
Dawn acknowledged that commentary surrounding the May 9 events may have crossed several red lines, but argued that imposing life imprisonment for speech-related offenses, particularly after trials conducted in absentia and under broad anti-terrorism provisions, was disproportionate to the alleged conduct.
Selective accountability and legal alternatives
The paper noted that measured legal remedies were available to the state, including civil defamation proceedings or narrowly defined criminal charges where content was demonstrably false, malicious, or defamatory, without resorting to the most extreme legal instruments.
Dawn also pointed to what it described as selective accountability, observing that some of those now facing severe punishment were previously prominent supporters of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party and had harshly targeted political opponents without attracting similar scrutiny at the time.
In its concluding assessment, the editorial said that while past political alignments and media conduct merit scrutiny, these factors do not lessen the seriousness of imposing life sentences on journalists and bloggers, warning that such actions weaken the moral authority of the state and deepen concerns about the future of free expression in Pakistan.
ATTRIBUTION: Based on reporting and editorial commentary published by Dawn
Key Points
-
Dawn's editorial criticized life sentences for journalists and YouTubers as an extreme measure
-
Islamabad anti-terrorism court awarded two life terms each in cases linked to the May 9 riots
-
The paper said trials in absentia and anti-terror laws were disproportionate for speech offenses
-
The editorial argued that civil defamation or limited charges were available alternatives
-
Dawn warned that selective accountability undermines the state’s moral authority
Relevant Topics
Ask AI: Understand this story your way
AI EnabledDig deeper, ask anything — get instant context, background, and clarity.
Disclaimer: This feature is powered by AI and is intended to help readers explore and understand news stories more easily. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated responses may occasionally be incomplete or reflect limitations in the underlying model. This feature does not represent the editorial views of JournalismPakistan. For our full, verified reporting, please refer to the original article.
