Authors of Intercept cipher story deny NYT correspondent's allegations on PTI involvement

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published August 10, 2023

ISLAMABAD—Murtaza Hussain, one of the authors of The Intercept story on the diplomatic cipher, has denied the claim of The New York Times correspondent in Pakistan that the cipher was given to them by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

Reacting to the story, Salman Masood, the correspondent for The New York Times in Pakistan and the editor of The Nation, claimed, "Taking things up a notch, PTI likely to be behind the leak of the controversial cable." He added that "Still, the contents don't prove a conspiracy but strained relations—and that was already known."

However, Hussain reacted sharply to the claim. He termed Masood's claim as false. "The @nytimes Pakistan correspondent is making a false claim suggesting that Imran Khan or members of his party were the source of our leak. I can confirm this is not true; if you have evidence to the contrary you are welcome to share it now, otherwise issue a retraction."

The Intercept story—"SECRET PAKISTAN CABLE DOCUMENTS U.S. PRESSURE TO REMOVE IMRAN KHAN"—has made public the text of the diplomatic cipher about the meeting between then Pakistani envoy to US Asad Majeed Khan and Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu on 7 March 2022.

Former Prime Minister Imran alleged that the US was behind his government's change, which was removed through a no-trust in the National Assembly.

Ray Grim, the story's co-author, also denied Masood's claim. He asked the NYT correspondent to withdraw his claim. "I can say with 100% confidence that this claim from the New York Times is completely untrue. Khan was not our source. Neither was any other civilian. Our source was in the Pakistan military. If the Times has evidence to the contrary, publish it. Otherwise retract this."

Even a win can't hide Pakistan's structural collapse in cricket

 June 11, 2025:  Pakistan celebrated a narrow win over Bangladesh, but beneath the jubilation lies a deeper crisis—from sidelined veterans to a collapsing domestic structure—signaling an urgent need for cricket reform.

Journalists stage walkout at post-budget briefing over government's dismissive attitude

 June 11, 2025:  Journalists walked out of the post-budget press conference in Islamabad to protest the absence of a technical briefing and the government's dismissive behavior, calling it unacceptable and intolerable.

Legal storm brews as Dr. Nauman Niaz serves defamation notice on Shoaib Akhtar

 May 31, 2025:  Dr. Nauman Niaz has issued a defamation notice to Shoaib Akhtar over derogatory remarks made during a recent broadcast, reigniting a longstanding media feud between the two prominent figures in Pakistan.

HRCP urges complete repeal of PECA, citing threats to free speech and civil liberties

 May 30, 2025:  The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan has demanded the full repeal of PECA, citing its vague language, coercive powers, and threats to free speech and digital rights in Pakistan.

PFUJ condemns murder of journalist Syed Mohammad Shah, urges immediate justice

 May 30, 2025:  The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) has condemned the murder of journalist Syed Mohammed Shah in Jacobabad, calling for urgent justice and improved safety for media professionals in Sindh.

State within a state? Police block reinstated Jang employees from resuming duties

 May 26, 2025:  In Rawalpindi, police allegedly side with Jang Group to block 66 reinstated employees from resuming work despite court orders, drawing sharp criticism from unions and press freedom advocates.

PFUJ slams Jang Group's 'economic massacre' after mass firing of over 80 workers

 May 25, 2025:  PFUJ condemns the Jang Group's decision to dismiss over 80 employees in Rawalpindi, calling it an 'economic massacre.' The union warns of nationwide protests if workers are not reinstated.

Labor rights trampled: Daily Jang defies court, terminates over 80 employees

 May 25, 2025:  Daily Jang Rawalpindi has terminated over 80 employees, including female staff, despite multiple court rulings in their favor—raising concerns over labor rights violations and misuse of authority in Pakistani media.