Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027 CPJ urges probe into attacks on Bangladesh media China bans obscene content sharing on private messaging Indonesian journalists urge fair policies to support media RSF warns over 500 journalists will spend holidays in prison Assaults on journalists in U.S. surge during 2025 protests Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027 CPJ urges probe into attacks on Bangladesh media China bans obscene content sharing on private messaging Indonesian journalists urge fair policies to support media RSF warns over 500 journalists will spend holidays in prison Assaults on journalists in U.S. surge during 2025 protests
Logo
Janu
Heavyweights

PEMRA advisory to Neo TV

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published 8 years ago

Join our WhatsApp channel

PEMRA advisory to Neo TV

ISLAMABAD – Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) has issued a directive to Neo TV for analyzing and commenting on a reference pending before the Supreme Judicial Council.

The regulator said this was a violation of Supreme Judicial Council’s orders dated 21 November 2015. These orders, it said were sent to all television channels on 23 November 2015.

These orders did not allow for public reporting of references pending in the Supreme Judicial Council. Only the judgment could be reported.

The violation by Neo TV occurred in its program Kahbar Kay Pechay on 13 March 2017. The host Fawad Chaudhry and guests Arif Chaudhry and Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar analyzed and commented on a pending reference.

PEMRA advised the channel to refrain from commenting on or analyzing the conduct of the honorable judges or on pending references.

“Only the Supreme Judicial Council has the right to decide on the honorable judges' conduct and not any anchor or analyst,” the regulator made it clear.

Image courtesy: pakdicussion.com

Don't Miss These

Newsroom
Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms

Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms

 December 24, 2025 Indian media organizations are debating ethical rules for artificial intelligence as newsrooms adopt AI tools, raising concerns over accuracy, accountability, and the future role of journalists.


Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom

Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom

 December 24, 2025 Media groups warn that a Democratic-backed bill could expand defamation liability, raising concerns over press freedom, investigative reporting, and potential chilling effects across U.S. newsrooms.


Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed

Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed

 December 24, 2025 Kashmiri journalist Irfan Meraj has spent over 1,000 days in detention by Indian authorities in Kashmir, renewing concerns over press freedom and legal pressure on independent media.


South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports

South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports

 December 24, 2025 South Korea’s parliament passed a law imposing tougher penalties on the media for false information, raising concerns from journalists over press freedom and investigative reporting.


Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027

Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027

 December 24, 2025 Israel’s Knesset has extended emergency legislation allowing limits on foreign media outlets until 2027, prompting renewed concern from press freedom groups over long-term impacts on reporting.


Popular Stories