Iranian editor jailed in provincial criticism case Pakistan minister flags AI impact on advertising jobs PTI announces boycott of select TV anchors and talk shows Media-state confrontation over BBC draws global attention RSF finds new Android spyware on detained Belarusian journalist phone Myanmar journalist jailed 13 years over reporting ahead of elections Yalda Hakim warns of a second deepfake video shared online Pakistan to launch BEEP secure messaging app for officials GTV News confers vice president title on Gharidah Farooqi Court reserves decision on Matiullah Jan narcotics charges Iranian editor jailed in provincial criticism case Pakistan minister flags AI impact on advertising jobs PTI announces boycott of select TV anchors and talk shows Media-state confrontation over BBC draws global attention RSF finds new Android spyware on detained Belarusian journalist phone Myanmar journalist jailed 13 years over reporting ahead of elections Yalda Hakim warns of a second deepfake video shared online Pakistan to launch BEEP secure messaging app for officials GTV News confers vice president title on Gharidah Farooqi Court reserves decision on Matiullah Jan narcotics charges
Logo
Janu
Insights

Media's dirty war - who won, who lost?

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published 11 years ago |  Daud Malik

Join our WhatsApp channel

Media's dirty war - who won, who lost?

ISLAMABAD: Almost two weeks since the attack on Hamid Mir in Karachi, a rhetorical question can be asked: Who has suffered more – the anchorperson or the media as a whole or the right to freedom of expression?


Going by the bitterly divisive atmosphere after April 19, there can be more than one answer, again highlighting the divide that is defining any debate on media freedom in Pakistan.


It is now no more a secret that the reaction to the attack on Mir from “both” sides has taken the attention away from journalists who have been killed and those who have been harassed and tortured. With no holds bar, the focus instead is on the infighting among the media houses and the “anchorpersons”.


On this year’s World Press Freedom Day, journalism and media are more than confused, lost in the vituperative tweets and retweets and manipulative presentation of information. The calls for restraint, ethical journalism, code of conduct and not going too far in infighting so as to lose the press freedom have fallen on proverbial deaf ears.


The media itself has become “burning” news in Pakistan, with salt and spice provided by the talk shows full of innuendoes, allegations and counter allegations. Today the fear is that these divisions will ultimately take away the freedom media has fought for in Pakistan, especially after 2007.  


After 2007 in the background of campaign to restore the judiciary almost every assessment report obviously mentions emergence of two fundamental changes in Pakistan – an independent judiciary and a freer media.  Though both the judiciary and media were lightly rapped for presenting themselves to the people of Pakistan as new messiahs, their suo motu and aggressive posturing were taken as part of new vibrant Pakistan.


But the shocking infighting between media houses shows that much more is at stake than the abstracts of freedom of expression, ethical journalism, and code of conduct.  Declan Walsh, no stranger to Pakistani media, puts it bluntly in his piece - Attack on Journalist Starts Battle in Pakistani Press: “Mr. Rehman (Mir Shakeel) of the Jang group has a rancorous relationship with Sultan Lakhani, who owns the smaller Express media group, which includes a television station and several newspapers (One of those papers, the English-language Express Tribune, prints The International New York Times in Pakistan). A third station, ARY, is owned by a family of gold dealers that has little love for Mr. Rehman.”


Though many felt strong editorial control on April 19 may have avoided the “crisis”, the control of owner as driver of editorial direction is perhaps making all other players in the media industry irrelevant. It is no surprise that a mixture of patriotism and media ethics underpinned by huge commercial interests has pitted known journalists against each other – tweet for tweet, talk show for talk show and column for column.

 

(The writer is a senior journalist who has worked for The News and Dawn)

Explore Further

Newsroom
Iranian editor jailed in provincial criticism case

Iranian editor jailed in provincial criticism case

 December 18, 2025 Iranian editor Majid Beiranvand has been sentenced to prison and internal exile, highlighting growing pressure on regional journalists and the use of criminal penalties to curb provincial reporting.


How combative videographers are changing protest coverage in Britain

How combative videographers are changing protest coverage in Britain

 December 18, 2025 Reporting examines how confrontational freelance videographers covering asylum hotel protests are reshaping local news sourcing, safety, and editorial practices in the United Kingdom.


Media-state confrontation over BBC draws global attention

Media-state confrontation over BBC draws global attention

 December 18, 2025 The global media spotlight growing political pressure on the BBC, highlighting risks to editorial independence, funding debates, and wider implications for public service journalism worldwide.


RSF finds new Android spyware on detained Belarusian journalist phone

RSF finds new Android spyware on detained Belarusian journalist phone

 December 18, 2025 RSF and partners say they uncovered a previously undocumented Android spyware, ResidentBat, on a seized phone of a Belarusian journalist, highlighting digital surveillance risks to media.


Myanmar journalist jailed 13 years over reporting ahead of elections

Myanmar journalist jailed 13 years over reporting ahead of elections

 December 17, 2025 Myanmar freelance reporter Sut Ring Pan sentenced to 13 years for reporting on the military ahead of elections, highlighting press freedom challenges and journalist detentions


Popular Stories