Pakistan has been ranked 159th out of 180 countries by Reporters Without Borders, highlighting a drastic decline in media freedom. Factors contributing to this decline include extremist groups and information wars.
Summary
PARIS: In its annual evaluation, the watchdog group Reporters Without Borders ranked Pakistan 159 out of 180 countries where media freedom suffered a “drastic decline” in 2014.
The media freedom suffered due to the insurgence of extremist groups such as the Islamic State and Boko Haram, the evaluation found.
“There has been an overall deterioration linked to very different factors, with information wars, and action by non-state groups acting like news despots,” the head of the Paris-based group, Christophe Deloire, told AFP.
The Reporters Without Borders 2015 World Press Freedom Index stated that there were 3,719 violations of freedom of information in 180 countries in 2014 – eight per cent more than a year earlier.
All parties in conflicts raging in the Middle East and Ukraine were waging “a fearsome information war” where media personnel were directly targeted to be killed, captured or pressured to relay propaganda, it said.
The Islamic State group active in Syria and Iraq, Boko Haram in northern Nigeria and Cameroon, and criminal organizations in Italy and Latin America all used “fear and reprisals to silence journalists and bloggers who dare to investigate or refuse to act as their mouthpieces,” said the watchdog, known by its French initials RSF.
North Africa and the Middle East contained notable “black holes” in which “entire regions are controlled by non-state groups in which independent information simply does not exist,” the group said.
“The criminalisation of blasphemy endangers freedom of information in around half of the world’s countries,” the report said, noting that religious extremists sometimes also go after journalists or bloggers they believe do not sufficiently respect their god or prophet.
RSF’s ranking put Iran, China, Syria and North Korea among the countries with the very worst levels of press freedom out of the 180 evaluated.
Repression of journalists in Ukraine during its early-2014 uprising against its pro-Kremlin president, and in Turkey during anti-government demonstrations earned both spots in the bottom quarter of the table.
“Police misconduct” during the Occupy Central protests in Hong Kong earned that territory a slide to 70th position.
The best-rated nations were northern European states such as Finland, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden, with New Zealand, Canada and Jamaica also making the top 10.
The United States ranked 49, three spots lower than in the previous report, in part because of what RSF said was the US government’s “war on information” against WikiLeaks and others.
In South America, Venezuela stood out with a 20-notch fall to a ranking of 137 due to the National Bolivarian Guard opening fire on clearly identified journalists during demonstrations. Libya dropped 17 places to 154 because of the national chaos that has seen seven journalists murdered and 37 kidnapped.
Russia slipped to the 152nd spot after introducing “another string of draconian laws,” website blocking and the extinction of independent media.
“Press freedom… is in retreat on all five continents,” RSF declared, claiming its indicators were “incontestable”. - AFP
Key Points
Pakistan ranked 159 out of 180 in media freedom index.
Drastic decline linked to extremist groups like the Islamic State.
3,719 violations of information freedom recorded in 2014.
North Africa and the Middle East have significant information control issues.
Countries like Iran, China, and North Korea had the worst press freedom rankings.
Dig deeper, ask anything — get instant context, background, and clarity.
Disclaimer: This feature is powered by AI and is intended to help readers explore and understand news stories more easily. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated responses may occasionally be incomplete or reflect limitations in the underlying model. This feature does not represent the editorial views of JournalismPakistan. For our full, verified reporting, please refer to the original article.
June 05, 2026: Pakistani camerapersons face serious risks covering floods, protests and attacks, often without training, protective gear or employer support.
May 31, 2026: May showed Pakistan's media under pressure from cybercrime enforcement, legal cases, newsroom layoffs and salary delays, plus tightened access for journalists.
May 24, 2026: Journalists walked out of the Parliament press gallery after claims that a Geo News reporter was barred from covering proceedings after questioning Bilawal.
May 23, 2026: Journalist Muhammad Saad was released after weeks in custody in a counterterrorism case; he thanked supporters and said he would not comment on the legal matter.
May 16, 2026: KP journalists protested over unpaid salaries and forced layoffs, demanding stronger labor protections and that state advertising be linked to clearing dues.
May 10, 2026: Journalist Imtiaz Chandio faces a terrorism FIR in Sindh after social media criticism of the SPSC, prompting concerns over use of penal laws against journalists.
May 04, 2026: PNP announced winners of its World Press Freedom Day Quiz 2026, a nationwide initiative to strengthen media literacy and awareness of press freedom.
June 05, 2026 Amar Guriro, founder of Pakistan's first AI-powered news platform, says journalism's future rests on human-AI collaboration to improve reporting while preserving editorial oversight.
June 05, 2026 Global Media Brief reviews pressures reshaping journalism, press freedom, AI and platform power, and reports BBC's Emmy, 60 Minutes turmoil and Taiwan's protest.
June 05, 2026 At the World News Media Congress in Marseille, publishers discussed how generative AI is altering newsroom workflows, audience engagement and content licensing.
June 04, 2026 Journalists in conflict zones face rising danger as combatants, states and militias increasingly target independent reporting to control narratives.
June 03, 2026 The 60 Minutes controversy at CBS exposes tensions over leadership, editorial independence and pressures on legacy TV journalism amid political polarization.