JournalismPakistan.com | Published September 14, 2024 at 10:08 am | JP Staff Report
Join our WhatsApp channelISLAMABAD-Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur has again gone after journalists. Almost a week after his derogatory remarks labeling them as "sellouts" and targeting an unnamed female television anchor, Gandapur has now escalated the situation by explicitly naming the journalist in question—Gharidah Farooqi—during another public address.
In his latest speech, Gandapur directly addressed the earlier outcry from journalists, stating, “Gharidah Farooqi, it is you. I am naming you. You were creating such a hue and cry. You are among those who take money to make political narratives. I will keep naming other journalists too.”
By naming a prominent female journalist, Gandapur has only intensified the backlash, which will surely prompt an outpouring of criticism from journalist bodies, civil society organizations, and media watchdogs.
Journalists were already up in arms after Gandapur's initial remarks during a PTI rally in Islamabad on September 8, where he accused media professionals of taking bribes to promote specific narratives. His latest comments, specifically targeting Gharidah Farooqi, have set the stage for further conflict.
Media Protest: Mics Removed, Boycott Trend on X
In response to Gandapur’s persistent attack, journalists on Friday removed their microphones from a PTI press conference, demanding an apology from Gandapur. This move was quickly followed by a social media storm, with the hashtag #BoycottMainStreamMedia trending on X (formerly Twitter), amassing over 32000 posts. The trend, largely supported by PTI’s digital media team, called for the boycott of television channels that "spread biased narratives."
The media’s protests, while justified in standing up to Gandapur’s rhetoric, have raised questions about the objectivity of Pakistan’s press. Are the media outlets genuinely defending their profession, or is there truth to PTI's claims of bias in favor of the government?
The Larger Issue: Is the Media Biased?
The PTI and its supporters argue that the mainstream media in Pakistan is biased against the party, particularly its chairman, Imran Khan. Many channels, in a clear departure from journalistic standards, refrain from even mentioning Imran Khan by name, referring to him only as "PTI’s founder." The PTI leadership believes this media blackout is politically motivated and reflects the broader control the government and its allies have over the press.
The controversy surrounding Gandapur and the media also highlights a deeper problem—the growing divide between political factions and the press in Pakistan. The role of the media is to report the truth, hold power accountable, and provide balanced coverage. However, it is increasingly clear that the media landscape has been compromised by political influences, forcing many journalists to walk a tightrope between truthful reporting and the agendas of powerful stakeholders.
Gandapur's Rhetoric vs. Media's Response: Where Does it Go from Here?
While Gandapur's comments have been widely condemned, the media's role in covering PTI has not been without criticism. The ongoing friction between PTI and the press reflects a broader issue of trust—both sides feel marginalized. PTI supporters accuse the media of promoting the government's narrative while silencing the opposition, while journalists feel increasingly unsafe, pressured, and targeted by politicians like Gandapur who use the press as a punching bag.
As the situation escalates, one thing is clear: the crisis in Pakistan's media is far from over. The call for boycotts and Gandapur's unapologetic stance will likely continue to deepen divisions, not only between the media and PTI but also within the media industry itself. For Pakistan's democracy to function effectively, there must be space for independent, unbiased journalism. Without it, both politicians and the public will continue to suffer from the distortions of truth that plague the country’s news outlets.
It's high time that both the media and politicians step back and reflect on their responsibilities. The press should focus on delivering impartial, fact-based reporting, and politicians must respect the role of journalists, not use them as tools in political battles.
The Way Forward
With the media demanding an apology and Gandapur refusing to back down, the situation remains volatile. This is not just a battle between a politician and the press—it's a reflection of a much larger struggle for the soul of Pakistan's media landscape. If Pakistan is to retain any semblance of press freedom and democratic integrity, there must be an end to both biased reporting and reckless attacks on journalists.
As the public turns more to social media platforms like X for real-time news and analysis, mainstream media must recognize its role in shaping narratives fairly and objectively, while politicians like Gandapur must cease targeting the press for political gain.
Photo: gnnhd.tv
April 30, 2025: Freedom of expression in Pakistan is under threat, as the 2025 Freedom Network report reveals increased arrests, censorship, and legal restrictions following amendments to PECA, posing serious risks to journalists and democratic values.
April 30, 2025: Dawn has criticized the Indian media's calls for war and condemned the banning of 16 Pakistani YouTube channels, urging a rational response after the Pahalgam attack that left 26 dead.
April 28, 2025: India has banned 16 Pakistani YouTube channels, including major news outlets and individual journalists, following the deadly Pahalgam attack. Tensions escalate as Islamabad demands a neutral probe.
April 23, 2025: Pakistani journalists respond in unison to a post hinting at a possible Indian military strike. Citing the 2019 ‘Swift Retort,’ they warn of a stronger response if provoked again.
April 21, 2025: After being expelled from PTI, MNA Sher Afzal Marwat launches personal attacks on journalists and Aleema Khan, sparking outrage on social media over his offensive remarks.
April 21, 2025: Journalist Sanaullah Khan reveals that the FIA has launched a financial crackdown on YouTubers by freezing the bank accounts of journalists and their family members—raising serious concerns over freedom of expression and legal process.
April 20, 2025: Dr. Nauman Niaz launched his fifteenth book, In A Different Realm: Story of Quadruple and Triple Centuries 1876–2025, at an elegant Islamabad event, reflecting on cricket’s rarest feats and his journey as a scholar of the game.
April 11, 2025: Sindhi journalist AD Shar was brutally murdered in Khairpur, Sindh. His body was found dumped on Handiyari Link Road. PFUJ has declared a three-day mourning period and demanded justice.
April 23, 2025 Discover Dr. Nauman Niaz’s In A Different Realm: Story of Quadruple & Triple Centuries 1876–2025, a profound exploration of cricket's most monumental innings, blending historical analysis with poetic narrative.
April 22, 2025 Once a beacon of hope for Pakistan's cricket revival, the Pakistan Super League now grapples with stagnation and moral compromises. Can this cultural symbol reclaim its lost soul?
April 21, 2025 An Italian newspaper, Il Foglio, successfully published a month-long AI-written insert and praised its irony and analytical abilities, while affirming that AI will complement—not replace—quality journalism.
April 03, 2025 The International Press Institute (IPI) and International Media Support (IMS) invite nominations for the 2025 World Press Freedom Hero and Free Media Pioneer Awards. Recognizing courageous journalists and innovative media, the awards will be presented at IPI’s 75th-anniversary World Congress in Vienna. Submit your nominations by April 30, 2025.
April 01, 2025 Photojournalist Suresh Rajak was burned alive while covering a violent protest in Kathmandu. The IFJ and its affiliates condemn the attack and call for an urgent investigation to hold the perpetrators accountable.