Pakistani media in 2025 tested by layoffs, laws, and trust Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027 CPJ urges probe into attacks on Bangladesh media China bans obscene content sharing on private messaging Pakistani media in 2025 tested by layoffs, laws, and trust Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027 CPJ urges probe into attacks on Bangladesh media China bans obscene content sharing on private messaging
Logo
Janu
All-Stars

IFJ condemns ban on two TV channels in India

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published 9 years ago

Join our WhatsApp channel

IFJ condemns ban on two TV channels in India

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and its affiliate the Indian Journalists Union (IJU) have condemned the Indian government’s decision to ban Hindi news channel NDTV India and News Time Assam for a day on November 9. The IFJ demanded the decision be immediately withdrawn.
 
On November 2, the Information & Broadcasting Ministry passed an order to prohibit the transmission or re-transmission of NDTV India channel and News Time Assam for one day on any platform throughout India with effect from 00:01 hrs on November 9, 2016 till 00:01 hrs of November 10, 2016.  The government invoked Rule 6(1)(p) of the Cable TV Network Regulation Act, which prohibits any program that contains live coverage of any anti-terrorist operation by security forces. This controversial new section was added to the program code in June 2015.
 
The decision was purportedly taken as NDTV India allegedly violated the Cable TV Act by revealing ‘strategically sensitive details’ while covering the terrorist attack on the Pathankot air base in January. A rule of the Cable TV Network (Regulation) Act allows government to restrict media coverage that contains live coverage of any ongoing anti-terrorist operation by security forces. However, despite all channels broadcasting similar footage, only NDTV India has been served the ban order.
 
The ban order on New Time Assam is purportedly for its coverage of a child subjected to torture, in which the identity of the child was revealed. However, other channels too had run similar footage.
 
Commenting on the ban order on NDTV India, IJU President S N Sinha, Secretary General Amar Devulapalli and Press Council of India members K Amarnath and Prabhat Dash in a statement said: “The unprecedented action of the union government reminds us of the dark days of emergency when the media was shackled. This is the first time that the government has used the provisions of the Cable Act to muzzle the media. The government intends to use the ban as a warning signal to other media houses as to what is in the store for them if the official narrative of the government is not accepted.” The IJU demanded the immediate withdrawal of the order and pledged its support to NDTV India.
 
The All India Newspapers Employees Federation (AINEF), in a joint statement by President SD Thakur, Vice President SK Pande and general secretary Balagopalan, called the ‘ban a selective attempt at targeting NDTV’. The AINEF said: “We express solidarity with the movement against the ban, which is ominous, unprecedented and an attack on freedom of the press. It is indeed arbitrary and a colorable exercise of power by the authorities to muzzle the press.”
 
The IFJ said: “The IFJ condemns the Indian government’s ban order on NDTV India and News Time Assam for a day, which it believes is a violation of press freedom. Referring the alleged violations of the program codes to the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA), an independent self-regulatory body would have been more in keeping with the spirit of professional peer review. The government’s arbitrary decision should immediately be withdrawn.” - IFJ media release

Don't Miss These

Newsroom
Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute

Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute

 December 25, 2025 European leaders push back against US visa bans on digital policy figures, warning the move could strain cooperation and deepen disputes over online speech and tech regulation.


Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns

Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns

 December 25, 2025 Morocco’s parliament has approved reforms to the National Press Council law, prompting protests from journalists who warn the changes may weaken self-regulation and media independence.


Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms

Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms

 December 24, 2025 Indian media organizations are debating ethical rules for artificial intelligence as newsrooms adopt AI tools, raising concerns over accuracy, accountability, and the future role of journalists.


Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom

Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom

 December 24, 2025 Media groups warn that a Democratic-backed bill could expand defamation liability, raising concerns over press freedom, investigative reporting, and potential chilling effects across U.S. newsrooms.


Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed

Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed

 December 24, 2025 Kashmiri journalist Irfan Meraj has spent over 1,000 days in detention by Indian authorities in Kashmir, renewing concerns over press freedom and legal pressure on independent media.


Popular Stories