Experts and activists express concerns that the Cybercrime Bill 2015 could limit freedom of speech and serve the government's political agenda. They emphasize the need for citizen involvement and amendments to the bill.
Summary
ISLAMABAD: The government harbors political motives behind cybercrime bill and wants to stifle freedom of expression and freedom of speech through the legislation.
This was stated by some experts and activists on Sunday during an interactive session organized by National Press Club, Islamabad and a group of working journalists.
Usama Khilji, an IT expert and activist with Bolo Bhi, said the government failed to take civil society and representatives of IT industry into confidence over the Cybercrime Bill 2015.
“In a democracy, it is unfair for a government to come up with legislation on a sensitive issue without active participation of the citizens and relevant stakeholders,” he said.
He said the government wants to serve its political objectives through the legislation as some of the clauses of the bill infringe upon freedom of expression of the citizens.
“If the bill is passed in its present form, the government will get the legal powers to block news websites, blogs, Facebook and Twitter accounts,” he said.
Khilji, however, said that he is not against the whole bill but some of its clauses must be amended before final adoption by the Parliament.
The Cybercrime Bill 2015 was recently passed by a National Assembly Standing Committee on Information Technology which the experts say is controversial and needs amendment.
Tahir Malik, Professor at National University of Modern Languages, said that a society cannot progress without critical thinking and fair competition to acquire modern techniques and skills.
“All segments of the society including journalists, doctors and engineers should be engaged to raise voice against the cybercrime bill as it is bound to curtail freedom of expression if passed by the Parliament,” he said.
Malik said the mainstream and social media are the modern age tools that help democratic governments to address social issues like poverty and crime.
“Unfortunately, our rulers are heavily influenced by monarchs of Saudi Arabia where even department of political sciences doesn’t exist in their universities,” he said.
Shaharyar Khan, President National Press Club, likened the cybercrime bill to Press and Publication Ordinance promulgated by President Ayub Khan in 1960.
“It is unfortunate that a democratic government wants to impose a law on journalists and the citizens that even dictators failed to do,” he said, adding the journalists concerns about the bill would be conveyed to the government.
Khan warned that if the government tried to pass the bill in its present form, then journalists would stage protest demonstrations against the government across the country, besides blocking coverage of parliamentarians.
Speaking on the occasion, Syed Ahmad, a representative of Pakistan Software Houses Association, said the cybercrime bill in its present form will hamper foreign investment in the IT industry.
“The government should not consider the technology a threat to it and must consider amendments to some of its controversial clauses,” he said.
Business models of news organizations are changing as they are fast turning to Internet and social media, he said, adding the government should apply forward thinking to strengthen journalists instead of curtailing their freedom of expression.
Key Points
The Cybercrime Bill threatens freedom of expression and speech.
Legislation lacks input from civil society and IT representatives.
Experts call for necessary amendments before passing the bill.
Journalists plan protests against the bill if passed in its current form.
The bill may deter foreign investment in Pakistan's IT industry.
Dig deeper, ask anything — get instant context, background, and clarity.
Disclaimer: This feature is powered by AI and is intended to help readers explore and understand news stories more easily. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated responses may occasionally be incomplete or reflect limitations in the underlying model. This feature does not represent the editorial views of JournalismPakistan. For our full, verified reporting, please refer to the original article.
June 05, 2026: Pakistani camerapersons face serious risks covering floods, protests and attacks, often without training, protective gear or employer support.
May 31, 2026: May showed Pakistan's media under pressure from cybercrime enforcement, legal cases, newsroom layoffs and salary delays, plus tightened access for journalists.
May 24, 2026: Journalists walked out of the Parliament press gallery after claims that a Geo News reporter was barred from covering proceedings after questioning Bilawal.
May 23, 2026: Journalist Muhammad Saad was released after weeks in custody in a counterterrorism case; he thanked supporters and said he would not comment on the legal matter.
May 16, 2026: KP journalists protested over unpaid salaries and forced layoffs, demanding stronger labor protections and that state advertising be linked to clearing dues.
May 10, 2026: Journalist Imtiaz Chandio faces a terrorism FIR in Sindh after social media criticism of the SPSC, prompting concerns over use of penal laws against journalists.
May 04, 2026: PNP announced winners of its World Press Freedom Day Quiz 2026, a nationwide initiative to strengthen media literacy and awareness of press freedom.
June 05, 2026 Amar Guriro, founder of Pakistan's first AI-powered news platform, says journalism's future rests on human-AI collaboration to improve reporting while preserving editorial oversight.
June 05, 2026 Global Media Brief reviews pressures reshaping journalism, press freedom, AI and platform power, and reports BBC's Emmy, 60 Minutes turmoil and Taiwan's protest.
June 05, 2026 At the World News Media Congress in Marseille, publishers discussed how generative AI is altering newsroom workflows, audience engagement and content licensing.
June 04, 2026 Journalists in conflict zones face rising danger as combatants, states and militias increasingly target independent reporting to control narratives.
June 03, 2026 The 60 Minutes controversy at CBS exposes tensions over leadership, editorial independence and pressures on legacy TV journalism amid political polarization.