Family and team revive Arshad Sharif’s YouTube channel Bangladesh politicians allege state inaction in media attacks Journalism is lost in Balochistan, Freedom Network study finds Journalists union says 76 reporters killed or wounded by Israeli forces Report says 706 journalists’ family members killed in Gaza CBS News leadership defends pulling 60 Minutes prison segment Independent media outlets expand influence as trust in news erodes Journalists outraged over treatment of KP leaders in Punjab Assembly 10 reasons why journalism matters more in Pakistan in 2026 Judge blocks US detention of British anti-disinformation activist Family and team revive Arshad Sharif’s YouTube channel Bangladesh politicians allege state inaction in media attacks Journalism is lost in Balochistan, Freedom Network study finds Journalists union says 76 reporters killed or wounded by Israeli forces Report says 706 journalists’ family members killed in Gaza CBS News leadership defends pulling 60 Minutes prison segment Independent media outlets expand influence as trust in news erodes Journalists outraged over treatment of KP leaders in Punjab Assembly 10 reasons why journalism matters more in Pakistan in 2026 Judge blocks US detention of British anti-disinformation activist
Logo
Janu
If Veena were an editor

Excessive prime-time coverage made TLP a household name: Supreme Court

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published 6 years ago

Join our WhatsApp channel

  Excessive prime-time coverage made TLP a household name: Supreme Court

ISLAMABAD - The Supreme Court criticized the role of media and regulator PEMRA during the sit-in by Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP) at Faizabad in November 2017 over the change in the wording of declaration of electoral candidates over the finality of the prophethood.

In its detailed verdict, the two-member SC bench comprising Justice Mushir Alam and Justice Qazi Faez Isa regretted that the “media provided unabated coverage to TLP. TLP’s leadership created hatred amongst the people, they abused, threatened and advocated violence; and this was broadcasted by some private television channels.”

According to the verdict, “TLP received prime-time free media coverage and publicity, transforming it overnight into a household name. Some talk-show hosts were termed unscrupulous who “incited and provoked citizens. The free publicity made TLP, a little known political party, into a phenomenon.”

This publicity helped TLP get a sizable number of votes in the general elections on 25 July 2018.

It said ISI’s report “identified Channel 92 as a television channel supporting TLP and stated that its owners had supplied food to the protestors occupying the Faizabad Interchange”.

It regretted that PEMRA, however, did not take action under the PEMRA Ordinance against any of its licensees for violating the terms of their licenses. “PEMRA abdicated its statutory duty, a duty which it was legally obliged to fulfil.”

On the other hand, it added that television channels and newspapers had complained about interference in their broadcasts and the delivery of their publications, but PEMRA failed to protect the legitimate rights of its licensed broadcasters.

“Broadcasts by DAWN and Geo television channels were stopped/interrupted; complaints stating this were acknowledged by PEMRA.  DAWN and Geo were particularly targeted in the cantonment and defence housing authority areas of the country, which too was confirmed by PEMRA. But, sadly, PEMRA looked the other way. It did nothing to protect the interests of its licensees nor took action against those cable operators who were responsible. On 19th March 2018 and on 24th April 2018, information was sought from PEMRA as to who was responsible, but PEMRA professed ignorance.”

It also regretted that daily Dawn, "the oldest English language newspaper of the country, which was founded by Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, was targeted the most."

The verdict said overt and covert censorship is unconstitutional and illegal. “Nebulous tactics, such as issuing advice to self-censor, to suppress independent viewpoints, to project prescribed ones, to direct who should be hired or fired by media organizations is also illegal.”

Photo: www.supremecourt.gov.pk

Read Next

Newsroom
Bangladesh politicians allege state inaction in media attacks

Bangladesh politicians allege state inaction in media attacks

 December 29, 2025 Bangladeshi politicians allege state inaction over attacks on media houses, prompting press groups to demand accountability and stronger protections for journalists.


Journalists union says 76 reporters killed or wounded by Israeli forces

Journalists union says 76 reporters killed or wounded by Israeli forces

 December 28, 2025 Palestinian Journalists Union says Israeli forces are silencing reporters through killings and injuries, raising urgent concerns over press freedom and safety in conflict zones.


Report says 706 journalists’ family members killed in Gaza

Report says 706 journalists’ family members killed in Gaza

 December 28, 2025 A Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate report warns that journalists’ relatives are being killed in strikes, raising grave press freedom, ethical, and legal concerns under international law.


CBS News leadership defends pulling 60 Minutes prison segment

CBS News leadership defends pulling 60 Minutes prison segment

 December 27, 2025 CBS News leadership defended pulling a 60 Minutes segment on an El Salvador prison, citing fairness and trust, sparking criticism over editorial independence and newsroom pressure.


Independent media outlets expand influence as trust in news erodes

Independent media outlets expand influence as trust in news erodes

 December 27, 2025 Industry research highlights the growing influence of independent and niche publishers as mainstream journalism faces declining trust, revenue pressures, and fragmented audiences worldwide.


Popular Stories