PFUJ rejects plan to set up media courts
JournalismPakistan.com | Published: 25 July 2019
Join our WhatsApp channel
The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists has condemned the government's proposal for media courts as detrimental to media freedom. Leaders of PFUJ argue existing mechanisms are sufficient for addressing media issues.Summary
KARACHI — Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) has rejected the ill-conceived idea of media courts, proposed by Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Media and Broadcasting Firdous Ashiq Awan.
Afzal Butt President and Ayub Jan Sarhandi Secretary-General of PFUJ in a joint statement condemned the idea and termed it as another arm-twisting of media and journalists, who are already under heavy censorship, financial crunch and victim of retrenchments.
PFUJ criticized the government for coming up with ideas like the media courts and Pakistan Media Regulatory Authority.
The union pointed out there already exist PEMRA and its Council of Complaints, Wage Board Implementation Tribunal, Press Council of Pakistan, and other laws and forums which can be made more effective and independent, for the resolution of conflicts and issues confronted by media, workers, and journalists.
The union leaders said the present government is engaged in media gagging, unannounced censorships, press advice and ban of government advertisements and other such tactics, which reminds one of the days of dictatorial regimes and martial laws in the country.
They urged the government to speed up its efforts for strengthening democratic culture, media freedom and right to expression guaranteed by the Constitution of Pakistan, instead of creating obstacles in the smooth functioning of the media and journalist community.
PFUJ called for urgent withdrawal of ill-conceived ideas like media courts and Pakistan Media Regulatory Authority. It said that these ideas were mere delaying tactics for resolving issues, the journalist community faces.
Photo courtesy: Samaa TV
KEY POINTS:
- PFUJ opposes the idea of media courts proposed by the government.
- The union argues existing bodies like PEMRA and the Press Council are adequate.
- PFUJ highlights ongoing censorship and financial pressures on journalists.
- Leaders call for a focus on strengthening media rights instead of imposing new regulations.
- The proposal is viewed as a tactic to undermine journalistic independence.
