Every frame at a cost: The safety crisis facing Pakistan's camerapersons Why journalists are increasingly targeted in conflict zones What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030 How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash Israel-Lebanon talks proceed as conflict hinders reporting Why governments are tightening controls on foreign journalists China condemns US restrictions on Xinhua reporter Taiwan condemns China over New York Times reporter expulsion The biggest threats facing journalism in Asia today Press freedom review: The many faces of pressure on the press Five warning signs for global journalism in May 2026 Cybercrime, courtrooms, and newsroom cuts: What defined Pakistan media in May Gaza journalists win 2026 Golden Pen of Freedom award Every frame at a cost: The safety crisis facing Pakistan's camerapersons Why journalists are increasingly targeted in conflict zones What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030 How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash Israel-Lebanon talks proceed as conflict hinders reporting Why governments are tightening controls on foreign journalists China condemns US restrictions on Xinhua reporter Taiwan condemns China over New York Times reporter expulsion The biggest threats facing journalism in Asia today Press freedom review: The many faces of pressure on the press Five warning signs for global journalism in May 2026 Cybercrime, courtrooms, and newsroom cuts: What defined Pakistan media in May Gaza journalists win 2026 Golden Pen of Freedom award
Logo
Janu
JournalismPakistan Original

Call a spade a spade

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published: 11 May 2012 |  The Communicator

Join our WhatsApp channel

Call a spade a spade
A Karachi-based commentary accuses Pakistani print and electronic media of ignoring or minimising a UK case in which eight Pakistanis were jailed. It argues that editors prioritise political coverage while avoiding reporting on serious social crimes and abuses.

KARACHI: No matter how dastardly the deed, the truth will come out; this is a fact of life. Therefore, it makes no difference how hard our print and electronic media might try to cover up certain issues or even blatantly choose to ignore it, reality will be known.

Why our media should choose to be so unethical or rather unprofessional as to deliberately leave out a news item, not cover it, or try to give it a twisted angle is hard to say. Indeed, it is an entirely different issue.

It comes as no surprise that the Pakistani media, both electronic and print, so steeped in political intrigues, chose to completely ignore the news that eight Pakistanis have been jailed in the UK for running a gang rape club. According to the Daily Mail, other newspapers and online sources, the men were sentenced to jail for a combined 77 years for the sexual abuse and rape of up to 50 girls.

As many as 47 teenagers were given alcohol, gifts and money before being passed around to have sex with several men a day, several times a week. At least one victim was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night. Two became pregnant as a result of the ordeal. One of them was 13 and had an abortion.

The ringleader, a 59-year-old who was not named because of legal restrictions, was jailed for 19 years for conspiracy, rape, aiding and abetting a rape, sexual assault and trafficking for sexual exploitation. Now is that ugly or what? So what do the editors do? They decide not to carry this story. It would disgrace the country to do so! People did not need to know such things.

Such things don’t happen in Pakistan or are done by Pakistanis. Then the religion thing also comes into play. Such things are haram and, of course, a real Muslim would never do it!

So this bunch of self-righteous, sanctimonious hypocrites that call themselves editors decide to be unprofessional and bury the news, if taken at all, in the inner pages; perhaps a few centimeters deep and most certainly no more than a single column. It’s hard for them to recognize the truth even when it’s staring them in the face.

In their reckoning perhaps it’s a ‘zionist plot’, maybe RAW at play, a foreign hand to disgrace the country. They will look for and come up with a hundred conspiracy theories to explain away such acts that, after all, do make up the grist of news any where else in the world.

But if only our editors could concentrate on things other than Imran Khan, Nawaz Sharif, Zardari, Gilani, Kayani, the Chaudhry’s and the almost voyeur-like infatuation with Veena Malik etc…. maybe we would have some real news in our newspapers and on television.

Ugly stories such as female foeticide, incest, child prostitution, child marriages, human trafficking, acid attacks, honor killings, social injustice, corporal punishment, bribery, rampant corruption, incompetence, etc would make news anywhere else in the world but not in Pakistan. It’s not done.

The editor is too caught up in political entanglements and enigmas to even know there is any other type of news and if he does, he does not have the balls to order it be taken. When journalists like Matiullah Jan try to bring such issues to public notice they are told to shut up and look the other way. Their reports are censored; their programs edited. So where is the free media in Pakistan?

Yet the media here thinks it is okay to show gory and graphic pictures and coverage of plane crash victims, flood-stricken and displaced people, accidents etc. That’s fine. No problem. But it is not okay to admit a group of Pakistanis were involved in the rape of 50 teenaged girls.

That is taboo just like the time in the late nineties when four Pakistanis were executed by a firing squad for mind numbing deeds with the body of a young girl at a graveyard in Sharjah. That story slipped under the radar or rather was deliberately allowed to. Necromancy and Pakistanis…ooh my!!

Recently, there was a story of a Pakistani couple that stole millions of dollars from residents of northern California before running back to Pakistan to live the good life. No mention of that also;it’s fine for Pakistanis to steal from non-Pakistanis; that is not haram. It’s fine. What about the Hindu girls that are being abducted, raped and forced to convert to Islam in Sindh.

Does anybody have the courage to write about that or put it in print or film? Also what about the little boys that are chained and kept prisoner at seminaries to be raped, abused and sold out to whoever wants them by the very people who are supposed to be teaching them about religion? Are these not issues? Should not such things be reported or covered?

The funny thing is that Pakistani journalists still have no inkling of the power of the social media such as Facebook and blogs. So try as they may to suppress such news and reports, it is not possible. The world out there is reporting and people are getting to know. Try and stop that!!

So the fact of the matter is that real journalists like Matiullah Jan can be censored and muzzled, unpleasant stories can be dropped or reduced to non-existence and editors/program directors can pretend nothing is happening other than the usual political mumbo jumbo, but the truth is out there and does get known.

Another truth; we need real editors and real journalists not stooges and pretentious nobodies who know swat about journalism or the ethics of the profession. (The Communicator is a senior Karachi-based journalist and a guest writer for JournalismPakistan.com)

Key Points

  • The article says Pakistani media largely ignored reports of eight Pakistanis jailed in the UK for a gang rape ring.
  • It cites claims that victims were teenagers subjected to grooming, rape and sexual exploitation.
  • The piece criticises editors for burying or twisting uncomfortable stories to avoid national embarrassment.
  • It argues that political personalities dominate coverage at the expense of social issues such as trafficking and violence.
  • It questions the state of press freedom and alleges censorship of journalists raising such topics.

Ask AI: Understand this story your way

AI Enabled

Dig deeper, ask anything — get instant context, background, and clarity.

Not sure what to choose? Try one of these.

The AI generates results based on your selected options
Your AI-generated results will appear here after you click the button.

Disclaimer: This feature is powered by AI and is intended to help readers explore and understand news stories more easily. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated responses may occasionally be incomplete or reflect limitations in the underlying model. This feature does not represent the editorial views of JournalismPakistan. For our full, verified reporting, please refer to the original article.

Explore Further

Newsroom
Why journalists are increasingly targeted in conflict zones

Why journalists are increasingly targeted in conflict zones

 June 04, 2026 Journalists in conflict zones face rising danger as combatants, states and militias increasingly target independent reporting to control narratives.


What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism

What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism

 June 03, 2026 The 60 Minutes controversy at CBS exposes tensions over leadership, editorial independence and pressures on legacy TV journalism amid political polarization.


Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030

Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030

 June 03, 2026 Zee Entertainment has secured broadcasting and digital rights in India for the 2026 and 2030 FIFA World Cups, reshaping the country's sports media landscape.


How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news

How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news

 June 02, 2026 Fact-checkers use source tracking, metadata, visual analysis and geolocation to verify whether viral videos in breaking news are authentic and timely.


Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash

Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash

 June 02, 2026 New Pentagon rules requiring official escorts for reporters in some areas have drawn criticism from press groups and major news organizations over transparency.


Popular Stories