Latest
07:28 PM
JournalismPakistan.com
April 10, 2016
ISLAMABAD: An inquiry commission in a 41-page report has ruled out the involvement of Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) in the attack on Geo TV journalist Hamid Mir two years ago.
The Express Tribune reported this on Sunday. The commission led by Chief Justice of Pakistan Anwar Zaheer Jamali, also included justices Ejaz Afzal Khan and Iqbal Hameedur Rehman. They observed that allegations the country’s premier intelligence agency's possible involvement in the attack were based on ‘suspicions, assumptions or apprehensions’.
Mir was attacked on April 19, 2014, when unknown suspects opened fire on his car along Shara-e-Faisal in Karachi.
Shortly afterwards Geo TV launched a propaganda campaign against the ISI. For several hours, the network aired reports accusing the agency of involvement in the attack while prominently flashing the photograph of then ISI Director General Lt-Gen (Retd) Zaheerul Islam.
After investigating the incident for nine months, the inquiry commission drafted a report which stated that, prima facie, there was a tug of war among some journalists and the ISI, because some media persons had told the commission the spy agency was unhappy with their reporting.
The Tribune said the report also observed there was a complete failure on the part of law enforcement agencies to investigate the attack. It mentioned that CCTV footage viewed during in-camera proceedings of the commission clearly showed two individuals at the Karachi airport behaving in a suspicious manner at the time of Mir’s arrival. Despite this, law enforcement agencies were unable to catch the actual culprits, it added.
The report said that even though officials of the ISI and Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) completely dissociated the spy agency from the incident, some members of the print and electronic media fraternity still pointed their fingers towards it. “We cannot lose sight of an important aspect of the matter – the interaction of media persons with agencies in the course of their professional duties. In the process, there are concerns raised on behalf of the agencies vis-à-vis reporting on sensitive issues of national security. Such concerns have their genesis in various articles of the Constitution, including articles 5 and 10(7),” the report stated.
It added that the right to freedom of speech is also subject to reasonable restrictions imposed, inter alia, in the interest of integrity, security and defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign states and public orders. “The mad race for breaking news and getting a lead makes things from bad to worse. Falsehood is propagated brazen-facedly and truth obliterated or, worse, confounded.”
The commission observed that the apparent conflict between media persons and agencies calls for a rational resolution so as to bring reconciliation, harmony and balance in the working of both sides.
It further stated that an appropriate mechanism is required to be put in place to deal with such complaints of journalists so that the individuals concerned are dealt with according to the law.
The report also directed attention at the recommendations of the commission probing the death of late journalist Saleem Shehzad. “We have gone through those recommendations and would reiterate the same. In this behalf, the recommendations made by a Special Working Group of the Pakistan Coalition on Media Safety to investigate the attacks against the media persons, namely provision for the appointment of a special prosecutor, legal aid unit, family counseling unit and primary case investigation unit, are also worth consideration at the appropriate level,” it said.
The commission regretted that the federal government did not take any step over those recommendations.
Related posts from JournalismPakistan.com Archives:
Hamid Mir injured in Karachi gun attack
US condemns attack on Hamid Mir
Attack on Hamid Mir: Dawn questions government's response
Hamid Mir sticks to his stance, distances himself from Geo apology
If my call is so important to them, why don’t they answer it for 22 minutes?
How come when I want to, but something specific online is the only item out of stock.
When I get into a queue or lane going fast, the moment I get in, it becomes the slowest and refuses to budge.
Read more... | Archives