Why only Nukta, Mr. Minister? Media workers question government's selective support Information Minister Tarar announces jobs for all 37 laid off Nukta employees Faisal Chaudhry’s viral one-liner on G for Gharidah steals the show A digital dream falters: Nukta cuts 37 jobs in Pakistan after only one year Pulitzer Center offers global grants for in-depth journalism CPJ urges probe after journalist Rana Ayyub receives death threats in India Talat Hussain says offensive viral clip was edited out, not aired on Samaa TV Moldovan journalist Mariana Rață receives death threat after interview PFUJ recalls November 3, 2007 emergency as Pakistan’s darkest day Indonesia’s agriculture minister faces backlash over lawsuit against Tempo
Journalism Pakistan
Journalism Pakistan

Pakistani media adopted 'severe self-censorship' during general election 2018: EU observation mission

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published 7 years ago

Join our WhatsApp channel

Pakistani media adopted 'severe self-censorship' during general election 2018: EU observation mission

ISLAMABAD - During the coverage of the general elections 2018 in Pakistan, the media adopted severe self-censorship in the face of efforts to stifle the reporting environment, according to the final report of the European Union Election Observation Mission.

“Editorial policies were carefully calibrated to downplay issues relating to the army, state security structures, and the judiciary,” says the report launched in Islamabad.

“Concerted efforts to stifle the reporting environment were observed, and included intimidating phone calls to senior editors, the disruption and hindrance of the distribution of broadcast and print outlets, and harassment of individual journalists. In such an environment, severe self-censorship was the safest option to continue publication.”

The report said controversial decisions by state institutions, including the Election Commission, which had an impact on the elections were not publicly examined. “Paid-for content and partisan discussion programmes dominated, and a substantial share of news was devoted to discontented voters and quotes from party leaders criticizing each other, leaving little space for non-partisan coverage of elections.”

The report maintains that there was no level playing for electoral contestants. “The media featured the three-horse race between the PTI, the PML-N and the PPP, coverage of which was tainted by corruption scandals and driven by court decisions. The PTI, the PML-N and the PPP joint share of exposure in all media was 81 percent, including within the news on electoral matters.”

Though PML-N was the most featured party during the elections campaign, “up to two-thirds of its coverage was negative in tone, including on court cases against the party leadership and on prominent defectors.”

On the other hand, the coverage of the PPP was mostly neutral or positive and predominantly afforded to the party’s campaign activities. The PTI also featured in either a neutral or positive manner. Among the leaders, “the PTI leader was by far the most quoted political figure across the media landscape….”

The report regretted that no debate between the party leaders took place, depriving voters of the possibility to directly compare them. Further, no analytical production compared party manifestos or scrutinized them for viability.

The editorial policy of the print media largely mirrored that of television. In total, 77 political parties were mentioned, but only 10 had a sizable presence in the news. The PML-N, the PTI and the PPP joint share of exposure was, on average, 76 percent. The press was less negative towards the PML-N than the TV channels. Overall, the coverage benefited prominent politicians, with Imran Khan’s photo being the most frequently used illustration of electoral news.

The report said social media served as both a vehicle for party propaganda and as a platform for news and analysis that opposed the official political discourse. Journalists and rights activists used online and social media to debate candidates, their manifestos and the conduct of state institutions. Frequently, videos, articles, and commentaries, rejected by mainstream media, were published on journalists’ private online accounts.

 

Read Next

Newsroom
Pulitzer Center offers global grants for in-depth journalism

Pulitzer Center offers global grants for in-depth journalism

 November 05, 2025 The Pulitzer Center is offering global reporting grants for journalists worldwide, funding high-impact projects on underreported issues with rolling applications in 2025.


CPJ urges probe after journalist Rana Ayyub receives death threats in India

CPJ urges probe after journalist Rana Ayyub receives death threats in India

 November 04, 2025 Journalist Rana Ayyub receives death threats over calls demanding a column on the 1984 anti-Sikh riots as CPJ urges swift action to protect journalists in India.


Moldovan journalist Mariana Rață receives death threat after interview

Moldovan journalist Mariana Rață receives death threat after interview

 November 04, 2025 TV8 journalist Mariana Rata in Moldova receives a death threat after interviewing politician Renato Usatii on-air, raising concerns about journalist safety.


Indonesia’s agriculture minister faces backlash over lawsuit against Tempo

Indonesia’s agriculture minister faces backlash over lawsuit against Tempo

 November 03, 2025 Global journalist unions condemn the Indonesian agriculture minister’s lawsuit against Tempo, calling it a threat to press freedom and demanding that the case be withdrawn.


All About Macau to cease print and online operations amid mounting pressure

All About Macau to cease print and online operations amid mounting pressure

 November 02, 2025 Independent outlet All About Macau to halt print and online operations amid rising pressure, financial strain, and legal threats, sparking press freedom concerns in the city.