What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism RFE/RL journalists persist with Iran war coverage amid risks Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030 How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash Israel-Lebanon talks proceed as conflict hinders reporting Why governments are tightening controls on foreign journalists China condemns US restrictions on Xinhua reporter Taiwan condemns China over New York Times reporter expulsion The biggest threats facing journalism in Asia today Press freedom review: The many faces of pressure on the press Five warning signs for global journalism in May 2026 Cybercrime, courtrooms, and newsroom cuts: What defined Pakistan media in May Gaza journalists win 2026 Golden Pen of Freedom award When AI writes the news, who checks the facts? What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism RFE/RL journalists persist with Iran war coverage amid risks Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030 How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash Israel-Lebanon talks proceed as conflict hinders reporting Why governments are tightening controls on foreign journalists China condemns US restrictions on Xinhua reporter Taiwan condemns China over New York Times reporter expulsion The biggest threats facing journalism in Asia today Press freedom review: The many faces of pressure on the press Five warning signs for global journalism in May 2026 Cybercrime, courtrooms, and newsroom cuts: What defined Pakistan media in May Gaza journalists win 2026 Golden Pen of Freedom award When AI writes the news, who checks the facts?
Logo
Janu
JournalismPakistan Global

IFJ urges Pakistan not to charge journalists for criticizing officials and institutions

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published: 24 September 2020

Join our WhatsApp channel

IFJ urges Pakistan not to charge journalists for criticizing officials and institutions
The International Federation of Journalists calls for the cessation of charges against journalists Asad Toor, Bilal Farooqi, and Absar Alam. Their prosecution under PECA raises concerns about the implications for free speech in Pakistan.

Journalists Asad Toor (pictured, center), Bilal Farooqi (left), and Absar Alam have all been charged with sedition between September 11 and 16 for publishing allegedly ‘objectionable’ and ‘derogatory’ material online.

The charges have been set under Pakistan’s sweeping 2016 Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA).

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), along with its Pakistan affiliate, calls on the authorities to reign in the broad powers of this Act to ensure no journalists are charged solely for criticizing government officials and institutions.

The PECA drew criticism before its implementation due to its secretive conception, and once implemented, sparked grave concerns over its criminalization of speech and the unchecked powers it gave to authorities to both curtail and prosecute it.

The law was supposedly created to “check extremist content, prosecute hate speech, and curb online harassment of women.” But it has had far-reaching implications above and beyond these pursuits, such as Section 37, which gives “unbridled powers” to the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority to restrict freedom of expression by blocking/removing online content.

Asad Toor was charged on September 12 after a public complaint citing that Toor had “used derogatory language to refer high-level government institutions, including the Pakistan Army.”

The First Information Report (FIR) detailing Toor’s offenses states he had breached PECA’s Sections 499 on defamation, 505 on statements conducing public mischief, and 20 on offenses against the dignity of a person, to name a few.

Farooqi was detained on September 11 following a complaint claiming that resulted in an FIR claiming he had “defamed” the Pakistan Military on social media.

Similarly, Alam faced an FIR for allegedly using derogatory language against “state institutions and personalities.” Both Farooqi and Alam were charged with sedition under PECA’s Section 20.

Prosecuting journalists for fulfilling their role as a check on government powers and a critical voice of government institutions is inherently undemocratic. Pakistan’s freedom of speech and its ability to function as democracy is much threatened by the implications of these sedition charges and their associated legislation.

The PFUJ Secretary General Rana Muhammad Azeem said: “The PFUJ believes in freedom of speech & expression and urges the authorities to be cautious and have thorough investigations before charging any media person, in accordance with the law of the land.”

The IFJ said: “The ruling party must reconsider this broad and sweeping legislation that has been shown to give the government the power to remove critical voices from public discourse. These recent sedition charges will undoubtedly influence the work of journalists in Pakistan and push the country’s media into passive submission. Journalists need a safe environment to both criticize and hold government officials and institutions accountable or democracy cannot function.”—IFJ media release

Key Points

  • Three journalists charged with sedition under PECA for criticizing officials.
  • IFJ highlights the chilling effect of such charges on media freedom.
  • PECA grants excessive powers to authorities, threatening free expression.
  • Charges stem from allegations of derogatory remarks against state institutions.
  • Calls for careful investigation before charging media personnel.

Ask AI: Understand this story your way

AI Enabled

Dig deeper, ask anything — get instant context, background, and clarity.

Not sure what to choose? Try one of these.

The AI generates results based on your selected options
Your AI-generated results will appear here after you click the button.

Disclaimer: This feature is powered by AI and is intended to help readers explore and understand news stories more easily. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated responses may occasionally be incomplete or reflect limitations in the underlying model. This feature does not represent the editorial views of JournalismPakistan. For our full, verified reporting, please refer to the original article.

Explore Further

Newsroom
What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism

What the 60 Minutes controversy means for TV journalism

 June 03, 2026 The 60 Minutes controversy at CBS exposes tensions over leadership, editorial independence and pressures on legacy TV journalism amid political polarization.


RFE/RL journalists persist with Iran war coverage amid risks

RFE/RL journalists persist with Iran war coverage amid risks

 June 03, 2026 RFE/RL journalists, including Persian-language reporters, continue covering the Iran-Israel-US conflict despite heightened security risks, restricted access, and significant operational challenges.


Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030

Zee secures FIFA World Cup rights in India through 2030

 June 03, 2026 Zee Entertainment has secured broadcasting and digital rights in India for the 2026 and 2030 FIFA World Cups, reshaping the country's sports media landscape.


How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news

How fact-checkers verify viral videos during breaking news

 June 02, 2026 Fact-checkers use source tracking, metadata, visual analysis and geolocation to verify whether viral videos in breaking news are authentic and timely.


Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash

Pentagon restrictions on reporters draw media backlash

 June 02, 2026 New Pentagon rules requiring official escorts for reporters in some areas have drawn criticism from press groups and major news organizations over transparency.


Popular Stories