Journalists face online threats after Bangladesh media attacks Media control at play on ARY News or a broadcast mishap Pakistani media in 2025 tested by layoffs, laws, and trust Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027 Journalists face online threats after Bangladesh media attacks Media control at play on ARY News or a broadcast mishap Pakistani media in 2025 tested by layoffs, laws, and trust Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom Kashmiri journalist Irfan Mehraj marks 1,000 days jailed South Korea passes tougher penalties for false media reports Israel extends foreign media restriction law to 2027
Logo
Janu
All-Stars

Bangladesh parliament passes draconian Digital Security Act

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published 7 years ago

Join our WhatsApp channel

Bangladesh parliament passes draconian Digital Security Act

The draconian Digital Security Bill 2018 has passed the Bangladesh Parliament with provisions curtailing the freedom of expression and independent journalism.

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) joins the Bangladesh Manobadhikar Sangbadik Forum (BMSF) in expressing serious concerns over the legislation which has scope to harass media and journalists.

On September 19, Telecommunication and Information Communication Minister Mustafa Jabbar placed the bill for immediate passage and the 350-member parliament passed the bill by voice votes with only 11 lawmakers opposing the bill. The formulation of the law was initiated in 2015 with the cabinet approving the draft on January 29, 2018, and placing in the House on April 9, 2018.

The Editors’ Council on September 16 in a statement rejected the bill stating that Sections 8, 21, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32 and 43 of the bill posed serious threats to freedom of expression and media.

Section 8 includes provisions about blocking or removing any information in the digital media over any content deemed hampering harmony, public order, or creating communal hatred, among other things. Section 21 states anyone ‘spreading negative propaganda against the Liberation War or the Father of the Nation, National Anthem and national flag’ using digital devices or instigating to do so would be punished with imprisonment for up to life term.

 According to Section 25, a person may be jailed up to five years for ‘deliberately publishing or broadcast on a website something attacking or intimidating or which can make someone feel disgruntled or knowingly publishing or broadcasting false or distorted information. Section 28 states if anyone hurts religious sentiments, they may face jail for up to 10 years. Section 29 states a person may face up to three years if they defame someone as stipulated in section 499 of the Penal Code through a website. Section 31 states a person may face up to seven years in prison if they are found to have deliberately published or broadcast something on a website which can spread hatred and create enmity.

As per Section 32, if a person commits any crime or assists anyone in committing crimes under colonial-era Official Secrets Act, 1923, through the electronic medium, he or she may face a maximum 14 years in jail. Section 43 allows a police officer to search or arrest anyone without any arrest warrant.

 Section 21, 28, 31 and 32 are classified as non-bailable offences.

The IFJ said: “The gross misuse of laws in Bangladesh, such as Section 57 of the ICT Act, to curtail freedom of expression and stifle critical voices raises serious concerns about these new laws which only strengthen the government’s power to control and suppress the media. The problematic provisions including Sections 8, 21, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32 and 43 raise serious concerns about the freedom of the press, with arbitrary provisions with scope for state agencies to harass and intimidation journalists. The IFJ calls for the law to be immediately amended to guarantee press freedom.” – IFJ media release

Don't Miss These

Newsroom
Journalists face online threats after Bangladesh media attacks

Journalists face online threats after Bangladesh media attacks

 December 26, 2025 Journalists in Bangladesh face rising online threats after mob attacks on media offices, amplifying fear for press freedom and safety in a tense political climate ahead of elections.


Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute

Europe criticizes US visa bans over digital speech dispute

 December 25, 2025 European leaders push back against US visa bans on digital policy figures, warning the move could strain cooperation and deepen disputes over online speech and tech regulation.


Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns

Morocco reforms press council law amid journalist concerns

 December 25, 2025 Morocco’s parliament has approved reforms to the National Press Council law, prompting protests from journalists who warn the changes may weaken self-regulation and media independence.


Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms

Indian media grapples with AI ethics in newsrooms

 December 24, 2025 Indian media organizations are debating ethical rules for artificial intelligence as newsrooms adopt AI tools, raising concerns over accuracy, accountability, and the future role of journalists.


Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom

Media warn Democratic bill could chill press freedom

 December 24, 2025 Media groups warn that a Democratic-backed bill could expand defamation liability, raising concerns over press freedom, investigative reporting, and potential chilling effects across U.S. newsrooms.


Popular Stories