PFUJ recalls November 3, 2007 emergency as Pakistan’s darkest day
November 03, 2025: PFUJ recalls November 3, 2007, as Pakistan’s darkest day under Musharraf, urging protection for journalists and the abolition of laws threatening press freedom.
JournalismPakistan.com | Published 3 months ago | JP Special Report
Join our WhatsApp channel
    ISLAMABAD—You might forcibly block 27 YouTube channels, but you can’t stop a voice with a mute button. In a chilling escalation of digital repression, an Islamabad magistrate’s court has ordered YouTube to block 27 channels owned by outspoken journalists, opposition figures, and independent social-media commentators—inside Pakistan and abroad—for allegedly spreading “anti‑state,” “fake,” and “provocative” content
This sweeping move sets off alarm bells: it’s not about isolated instances of wrongdoing—it's a systemic crackdown aimed at silencing dissent.
The 27 Channels Facing the Ban:
These voices represent some of the most influential independent analysts and critics in Pakistan’s digital sphere, including Asad Toor, Matiullah Jan, Ahmad Noorani, Moeed Pirzada, Imran Riaz Khan, and Arzoo Kazmi
Their alleged offense? Questioning the state, criticizing military influence, and exposing human rights abuses. Yet instead of debating or rebutting their assertions, the government seeks power through erasure.
Why Blocking Won’t Work—and Adds Fuel to the Fire
Geoblocking ≠ Silencing: Platforms can regionally restrict content, but overseas viewers can bypass it via VPNs. The channels remain alive, and their messages spread globally. The magistrate’s court skipped due process—there was no right to reply for the creators. This isn’t legal action—it’s a PR stunt, masking authoritarian impulses under legalese.
Calls for censorship often create the opposite effect—drawing international media scrutiny, driving subscriptions, and empowering the discourse the government seeks to erase.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan condemned this broad censorship, warning it conflates dissent with criminality and violates constitutional protections. Meanwhile, digital‑rights groups and legal experts slammed the court’s overreach, citing violations of Article 19 and due‑process clauses.
Even the Supreme Court Bar Association warned that criminal charges based on “anti‑state content” threaten the very fabric of press freedom
In Context: A Broader Crackdown
This censorship isn’t an anomaly—it’s part of a consistent trend: courts ordering bans on X, Facebook, TikTok, and now multiple YouTube channels. New amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act empower tribunals to punish “fake news” with prison or hefty fines, primarily to bully critics, not mainstream sources
Silencing free voices rarely succeeds. Instead, it exposes insecurity: when regimes fear debate, they resort to digital lockdowns, not discourse. Pakistan’s government may temporarily dim the spotlight, but 27 channels cannot—and will not—be silenced forever. The stifling tactic is transparent: it won’t quell criticism, but it will fuel it.
The government can ban YouTube channels, but it cannot ban the truth.
    November 03, 2025: PFUJ recalls November 3, 2007, as Pakistan’s darkest day under Musharraf, urging protection for journalists and the abolition of laws threatening press freedom.
    November 02, 2025: PFUJ urges Pakistan’s federal and provincial governments to end Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists and ensure their safety and press freedom.
    November 02, 2025: Impunity for crimes against journalists deepens worldwide as Pakistan reports a 60 percent surge in attacks and weak enforcement of safety laws.
    November 01, 2025: Pakistan Press Foundation reports 137 attacks on journalists in 2025, highlighting rising threats, legal harassment, and censorship on the International Day to End Impunity.
    November 01, 2025: A viral Samaa TV clip featuring MNA Sher Afzal Marwat’s crude remarks and Talat Hussain’s laughter raises questions about the declining ethics of Pakistani television.
    October 31, 2025: Police foiled a plot to kill DawnNewsTV journalist Tahir Naseer in Rawalpindi after arresting suspects hired for Rs200,000. Naseer says threats followed his reporting.
    October 31, 2025: CPJ calls on Pakistan to bring Imtiaz Mir’s killers to justice after the journalist was allegedly murdered by a banned militant group in Karachi.
    October 30, 2025: The PFUJ has condemned a fabricated drug case against journalist Matiullah Jan, calling it an attempt to silence him and urging authorities to quash the charges immediately.

November 03, 2025 Global journalist unions condemn the Indonesian agriculture minister’s lawsuit against Tempo, calling it a threat to press freedom and demanding that the case be withdrawn.

November 02, 2025 Independent outlet All About Macau to halt print and online operations amid rising pressure, financial strain, and legal threats, sparking press freedom concerns in the city.

November 01, 2025 Belarus court jails journalist Siarhei Chabotska for extremism and defaming the president, highlighting Minsk’s ongoing crackdown on press freedom.

November 01, 2025 Mexican journalist Miguel Angel Beltran was found murdered in Durango. CPJ urges authorities to ensure justice amid rising violence against journalists in Mexico.

November 01, 2025 UNESCO survey finds one-third of media lawyers cannot effectively defend journalists due to threats, limited resources, and lack of specialization.