Veteran journalist Javed Iqbal Jaidi bids farewell after long health battle Myanmar’s media crackdown deepens as UN, rights groups sound alarm Russia slams Pakistan’s Frontier Post for ‘Western bias’; newspaper hits back Javed Chaudhry signs off from Express News after 18 years on ‘Kal Tak’ Why only Nukta, Mr. Minister? Media workers question government's selective support Information Minister Tarar announces jobs for all 37 laid off Nukta employees Faisal Chaudhry’s viral one-liner on G for Gharidah steals the show A digital dream falters: Nukta cuts 37 jobs in Pakistan after only one year Pulitzer Center offers global grants for in-depth journalism CPJ urges probe after journalist Rana Ayyub receives death threats in India
Journalism Pakistan
Journalism Pakistan

Islamabad High Court reserves judgment on petitions in Arshad Sharif murder case

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published 2 months ago |  JP Staff Report

Join our WhatsApp channel

Islamabad High Court reserves judgment on petitions in Arshad Sharif murder case

ISLAMABAD — Justice Inam Amin Minhas of the Islamabad High Court on Tuesday reserved judgment on petitions filed by journalist Hamid Mir and Javeria Siddique, the widow of slain journalist Arshad Sharif, seeking the formation of a judicial commission to investigate the circumstances surrounding Sharif’s murder.

Justice Minhas, however, questioned whether the High Court could rule on the matter while it was already pending before the Supreme Court.

Following the hearing, Javeria Siddique voiced her frustration on social media over what she called delaying tactics by the judiciary. “A year ago, I had requested in the court of Justice Aamir Farooq that my petition be clubbed with the petition of senior anchor @HamidMirPAK. The court reserved its decision then, and now after a year, the hearing has begun again only to be reserved once more,” she wrote.

She accused the government of showing no seriousness in pursuing the case. “The courts keep adjourning the hearings, giving the government time, but months and years have passed. If the government couldn’t get the MLA signed in Kenya, how can it be expected to take action against those who filed 16 FIRs against Arshad Sharif in Pakistan and those who threatened him with murder? The government’s authoritarian grip is suffocating the nation, and their disregard for democracy and human rights is appalling. Meanwhile, the judiciary remains silent.”

During Tuesday’s proceedings, Hamid Mir appeared in court with his lawyer, Barrister Shoaib Razzaq. The counsel argued that a judicial commission should be constituted to probe Sharif’s killing and even be sent to Kenya if needed. He recalled that when Mir himself was attacked, the Supreme Court had formed a judicial commission.

Razzaq noted that Arshad had planned to return to Pakistan before his murder and stressed that the 16 FIRs registered against him and the threats he faced must be investigated. “The Supreme Court cannot conduct the investigation itself; it is the commission that must carry it out,” he said.

Justice Minhas questioned what would happen if reports from the FIA, Supreme Court, Kenyan authorities, and FIRs all produced conflicting outcomes. He also inquired about the progress of the FIRs filed in the case.

The DIG of Punjab Police informed the court that seven reports have been submitted to the Supreme Court, FIRs registered, and challans filed. He added that while the situation in Kenya remains unstable, the investigation is moving forward, with two suspects already declared absconders.

Razzaq argued that despite three years having passed, the matter has only advanced as far as report submissions. “This case is not just about Hamid Mir or me—it concerns the entire country,” he said.

At the end of the hearing, the High Court reserved its decision on the petitions.

Explore Further

Newsroom
Myanmar’s media crackdown deepens as UN, rights groups sound alarm

Myanmar’s media crackdown deepens as UN, rights groups sound alarm

 November 07, 2025 UN and rights groups warn of escalating media repression in Myanmar, citing arrests, censorship, and digital surveillance that threaten to erase independent journalism.


Iran tightens digital control with new wave of news site blockages

Iran tightens digital control with new wave of news site blockages

 November 07, 2025 Iran has intensified online censorship, blocking independent news sites and social channels, sparking protests from journalist groups over the growing suppression of press freedom.


Six journalists summoned in Turkey over coverage of detained opposition mayor

Six journalists summoned in Turkey over coverage of detained opposition mayor

 November 07, 2025 Six Turkish journalists have been summoned over coverage of opposition mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, raising fresh concerns about press freedom and political repression in Turkey.


Record journalist deaths in Gaza highlight deepening impunity crisis

Record journalist deaths in Gaza highlight deepening impunity crisis

 November 07, 2025 Over 285 journalists have been killed in Gaza since 2023, exposing a severe impunity crisis and raising calls for global action to protect press freedom.


Arab states tighten digital content laws, raising concerns over press freedom

Arab states tighten digital content laws, raising concerns over press freedom

 November 07, 2025 Arab states are tightening digital content laws, with new regulations in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt raising fresh concerns about media freedom and online expression.