Investigating investigative journalism

 JournalismPakistan.com |  Published May 2, 2012 |  Rashid Ali

LAHORE: Dawn's Mubarak Zeb Khan recently won an All-Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) award for being the ‘Best Investigative Reporter’ in the Business/Economics category. It would be surprising if he had not. After all, Mubarak was better equipped to land his hands on the silverware than most of his rivals.

I’ve heard from here and there that the award had as much to do with his seniority as a journalist in the Business/Economics category and the newspaper he works for rather than the award winning story.  As far as I’m concerned this is a case of ‘sour grapes’.

Mubarak is a knowledgeable journalist and a pretty meticulous one. He is also very tenacious and this one attribute mixed with well-directed probing leads to a good investigative report. It’s so simple.

True, Mubarak can be quite abrasive and quite easily gets under one’s skin; his cynicism is usually over the top and, depending on the circumstances, he may or may not be likeable, but one thing is for sure… Mubarak deserved that award more than any of the other nominees.

Why?

Because Mubarak worked hard on a consistent basis and produced stories that were accurate, informative, researched, cohesive, covered all facets and above all properly investigated. That is why his stories have been having the impact they have. He was simply doing his job the right way.

There are other factors that come into play – discipline, experience and contacts and above all, a nose for a good story. Once again, that’s proper journalism. So Mubarak used all the tools of the trade. He knew what to do, how to do it and why.

Recently, I attended a workshop on journalism in Islamabad. Although a journalist by default, I was shocked to discover that many of the so-called journalists and a good number of the so-called ‘seniors’ attending the workshop did not know the five Ws and one H of journalism – what, when, why, where, who and how!!

They were more interested in strutting about, showing off about stories they had done and which may or may not have been read or seen on television. I wish I could have got my hands on half those stories. I’m sure most of them would fail not only in language, but description, authenticity and purpose. Most probably they would not have a flow and there would be no start, middle and end.

I have come across plenty of these journalists in the recent past. They come out of college/university and want to be a journalist mostly because they think its ‘glamorous’. Well it’s not. There is hard work involved.

What really disturbs me is they use such words as ‘investigative stories’, ‘exclusives’, ‘specials’, ‘exposes’ etc as  if they were discussing lunch or the meal they had the previous night. They talk about innovation, new journalism, and linear writing as if they were no big deal.

Pretty impressive stuff if one was not initiated in this new found ‘smart speak’ that in truth rings as hollow as an empty drum. Their writing is loaded with clichés, phrases and blatant plagiarism. They think its ‘cool’ to use slang and fashionable to use street words.

The first rules of writing demand one to be clear, lucid, cogent and coherent while also be easily readable. That is why seasoned journalists often talk about ‘hitting their rhythm’ or being ‘in the flow’. They write from the reader’s perspective and ensure they are easily understood. One is moved to admire such writing for its accessibility, its readability. It’s lack of pretension.

Most of all, however, I’m irked by all this talk about ‘investigative journalism’.  There are a number of dubious players in the game right now in Pakistan who profess to being gurus of ‘investigative journalism’, pioneers in teaching ‘investigative journalism’ and promoting the cause of ‘investigative journalism.’ Some of these so-called experts have never written a story/report for a newspaper, magazine or TV channel ever and yet our journalists naively fall for their hypnotic mumbo-jumbo.

They even organize award ceremonies and workshops on ‘investigative journalism’ although they have never been nor ever will be journalists. For them it’s all a matter of feeding their bloated egos and making a fast buck, usually from willing donor agencies and NGOs. These individuals and establishments are vultures that know an opportunity when they see one.

I have a point to make: “What is journalism if it is not a process of investigation?” How can one write a report/story if he has not investigated, not asked questions, not run down the leads and information, has not talked to people concerned, has not researched what he is writing about, does not have literature on the subject? Does not know the inside and outs of the event -the who, the what, the why?

Is that not journalism? Is investigation not part of journalism?

So what is this ‘investigative journalism’ semantic crap trap we find ourselves ensnared in?

Sometimes, a journalist investigates on his own, follows leads and chases down a story on his own and yet on other occasions he works with a partner or even a team. They do what generations of journalists have done before. So how then is ‘investigative reporting’ suddenly in the limelight? It is not an invention, not new, not unique. It’s always been part of the game.

The one factor I’m willing to cede is that ‘investigative reporting’ should encompass a report or story that has a far-reaching impact, covers a broad canvass and impacts a large number of people, is incisive, comprehensive and leads to a point which incurs proactive results.

This is my opinion; this is my investigation.

(Rashid Ali is a guest writer for JournalismPakistan.com)
 

Stakeholders demand meaningful consultation for Internet governance in Pakistan

 December 05, 2024:  UNESCO and IRADA hosted a national consultation in Islamabad, calling for inclusive Internet governance reforms in Pakistan to protect digital rights, freedom of expression, and access to information through multi-stakeholder collaboration.

Fact-check: Viral video claiming Matiullah Jan's expulsion from PMA is false

 December 04, 2024:  A viral video claiming journalist Matiullah Jan was expelled from PMA has been debunked by iVerify Pakistan. The video, edited with AI, originates from the drama serial Ehd-e-Wafa.

Matiullah Jan freed amid fears of transfer to Attock

 November 30, 2024:  Journalist Matiullah Jan has been released from Adiala Jail after securing bail, ending fears of a potential transfer to Attock Jail. He expressed gratitude to supporters and shared light-hearted moments about his custody.

Dawn criticizes Matiullah Jan's arrest as 'misuse of the law'

 November 30, 2024:  Daily Dawn condemns the arrest of journalist Matiullah Jan as a misuse of the law. The editorial highlights concerns over the state's weaponization of legal provisions against journalists, activists, and dissenters.

Anti-Terrorism Court grants bail to Matiullah Jan

 November 30, 2024:  The Islamabad Anti-Terrorism Court has granted bail to journalist Matiullah Jan in a case involving drugs and terrorism charges. He was released on a surety bond of PKR 10,000 following the suspension of his physical remand by the Islamabad High Court.

LHC summons IG Punjab, demands CCTV footage in journalist Shakir Awan case

 November 29, 2024:  The Lahore High Court has ordered the production of journalist Shakir Mahmood Awan’s alleged kidnapper by Monday while summoning IG Punjab and demanding CCTV footage from Safe City.

Unethical reporting: Suno TV targets Matiullah Jan amid controversial arrest

 November 29, 2024:  Suno TV faces criticism for targeting senior journalist Matiullah Jan with a smear campaign following his controversial abduction and arrest. This raises serious concerns about media ethics and press freedom in Pakistan.

WISPAP seeks extension for VPN registration deadline

 November 29, 2024:  WISPAP has requested the Ministry of Interior to extend the deadline for VPN registration in Pakistan, citing the need to ensure compliance amid increasing VPN usage after platform bans.