JournalismPakistan.com September 12, 2017
By now, the masterminds of Gauri Lankesh’s murder have surely put enough space between themselves and those who carried out the dastardly act.
Around the world, police say that if you don’t get a lead in the first 48 hours of a capital crime, the trail grows cold.
According to Crime Investigation, a website dedicated to police work around the globe: “In medicine, this is called the ‘critical hour.’ In criminal investigations, they call it ‘the first 48 hours’. Ask any detective: They’ll tell you that if they don’t have a lead, a suspect or an arrest within 48 hours, their chances of solving the case are cut in half.”
In this case, five days have passed. No clues have been uncovered. Investigative agencies are on thin ice. With every passing hour, the degrees of separation between Lankesh’s assailants and investigators increase exponentially.
Usually, after a high-profile crime, there is a flurry of activity. A special squad is assembled. The police prepare to hunt the suspects down. In this case, not only is such activity absent entirely, there is hardly news of arrests or roping in those who might be able to assist the probe.
Instead of the police making a list of enemies and people who may have had the motive to target her, we get news of Lankesh’s parents exhorting chief minister Siddaramaiah to find the killer and his dutiful response. Why should grieving parents be forced to undergo this torture of appealing for justice?
What is worrying is that even as the authorities get their ducks in a row — and let’s be fair, they may be playing their cards close to their chest — Lankesh’s reputation as a firebrand, her many rows with the rich and powerful combined with the fact that she was a thorn in the side of vested interests makes it likely that influence might be exerted on various levels to thwart the hunt for her killers.
Add to all this, the public has the memory of a goldfish. For Lankesh’s killers, all these factors could combine to find a way out of this sticky mess. Today, the news is like a firecracker. It explodes with a loud bang, shines briefly and then dissipates.
It isn’t wrong to say that with all the unsubstantiated accusations flying about and obscuring the principal issue of who killed Lankesh, the fear is that political parties are using her death to sling mud at each other.
The fear is that some patsy, wearing a scarf around his neck and flanked by ten smug policemen, will be paraded in a few days. Case closed.
The nation will be told: It was a clear cut case of personal vendetta. It had nothing to do with conspiracies hatched in the corridors of power, be they political or economic.
Only the gullible would fall for this line, but it seems that every day, the ranks of the gullible are swelling.
Besides, no one really wants to follow the crumbs to its logical (and perhaps awkward destination).
And if as many as 40 witnesses connected to the Vyapam Scam can be eliminated in the past 20 years, then, by comparison, Lankesh’s killing is small fry.
It is extremely unlikely that we will ever learn who ordered Lankesh’s death.
That bird has already flown the coop it seems which is a real pity.
Gauri Lankesh, a senior journalist was shot dead by unidentified assailants at her home in Bengaluru, India. She was the editor of weekly magazine Lankesh Patrike
(The writer is a Senior Editorial Advisor of Khaleej Times and the paper’s former Editor. He has also been the Editor of Gulf News, Gulf Today, Emirates Today and Bahrain Tribune)
Daily Times, April 4, 2017
As we move into the second week of the stay-home directive, many of us must be discovering a new inner self, and how much we take for granted and miss it sorely when it is gone.Read more... | Archives
A study conducted by JournalismPakistan.com and Communications Research Strategies on the economic situation of slain journalists' families and journalists displaced due to security threats.